Federal Court Representation
When the System Fails You, Federal Courts Can Compel Action
Former DHS Trial Attorney and former Immigration Judge Law Clerk — we know how the government litigates, and we know how to beat them in federal court.
What Are Federal Immigration Cases?
Federal immigration cases arise when the standard administrative process has failed — when agencies delay indefinitely, make unlawful decisions, or violate your constitutional rights. In these situations, the federal district courts and courts of appeals become the arena where justice is pursued.
Unlike immigration court proceedings before EOIR, federal litigation takes place in Article III courts with independent judges who are not part of the executive branch. This independence is critical when challenging agency overreach, unconstitutional detention, or years of bureaucratic inaction.
Attorney Sammy Aliferis brings a unique perspective to federal immigration litigation — having served as a DHS Trial Attorney and as a Law Clerk to an Immigration Judge, he understands exactly how the government builds its cases and where its arguments are vulnerable.
Areas of Federal Practice
Federal Remedies We Pursue
Mandamus Actions
When USCIS or other agencies unreasonably delay adjudicating your visa, green card, or citizenship application, a Writ of Mandamus filed in federal court can compel them to act.
Habeas Corpus Petitions
If you or a loved one is being unlawfully detained by ICE or DHS, a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenges the legality of that detention in federal court.
Detention Challenges
Prolonged immigration detention without a bond hearing or meaningful review violates due process. We litigate detention challenges in federal court to obtain bond hearings or release.
USCIS Decision Delays
Unreasonable processing delays on I-485, I-130, N-400, or other applications can devastate families and careers. Federal litigation compels USCIS to adjudicate pending applications.
Petitions for Review
When the Board of Immigration Appeals issues an adverse decision, a Petition for Review filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals can challenge legal errors and constitutional violations.
APA Challenges
The Administrative Procedure Act allows federal courts to review agency actions that are arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. We challenge unlawful USCIS policy changes.
Why Federal Litigation May Be Your Best Option
Administrative Remedies Exhausted
When appeals to USCIS, the BIA, or immigration courts have failed, federal courts offer a new forum with independent review.
Agency Inaction or Delay
Federal courts can order agencies to act within specific timeframes — often the only way to overcome years of bureaucratic delay.
Constitutional Violations
Federal courts are the proper forum to address due process violations, unlawful detention, and other constitutional claims.
Negotiating Leverage
Filing suit in federal court often prompts agencies to resolve cases favorably before a judge decides — creating powerful settlement leverage.
Your Federal Case Deserves Experienced Counsel
Contact us today for a confidential consultation about your federal immigration matter.
